home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets expos directories catalogs resources advertise contacts
 
News Page

The news
and
beyond the news
Index of news sources
All Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Middle East North America
  Topics
  Species
Archives
News archive 1997-2008
 

Monsanto's soybean patent cannot stretch to processed soy meal, European Court of Justice says


Geneva, Switzerland
July 7, 2010

Source: Intellectual Property Watch
by Catherine Saez

Yesterday, the European Court of Justice ruled in a case pitching Monsanto against European importers of Argentinean soy meal, denying the US seed giant intellectual property rights over the exports of soy meal from Argentina to the European Union.

The importers were supported by the Argentina government. After three cargo shipments to the Netherlands were detained in 2005 and 2006 and found by Monsanto to contain DNA sequence of its herbicide tolerant soy, which was not under patent in Argentina, the company applied for injunction against the importers before The Hague District Court, and “for a prohibition of infringement of the European patent in all countries in which the patent is valid,” according to the judgement.

Monsanto holds patents on the DNA sequence of soy beans resistant to its Roundup herbicide in Europe. One of the European exporters, supported by the Argentine state, argued that the DNA present in the soy meal no longer performed its function as such. Under debate was the interpretation of Article 9 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. The Court agreed with the defendant.

Click here to read the Court judgment (case C/428-08).

Days before the judgment, Monsanto withdrew its legal complaint against the European soy meal importers and settled the case, according to news sources. It is unclear what impact this has on interpretations of the ruling.

In its judgment, the Court found: “Article 9 of Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions is to be interpreted as not conferring patent right protection in circumstances such as those of the case in the main proceedings, in which the patented product is contained in the soy meal, where it does not perform the function for which it is patented, but did perform that function previously in the soy plant, of which the meal is a processed product, or would possibly again be able to perform that function after it had been extracted from the soy meal and inserted into the cell of a living organism.”

Related Articles:



More news from: Intellectual Property Watch


Website: http://www.ip-watch.org

Published: July 7, 2010

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated
Fair use notice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.more. Keyword news
   
intellectual property protection

 


Copyright @ 1992-2025 SeedQuest - All rights reserved