Finland
June 28, 2013

Crop models estimating wheat yields disagree considerably under climate change scenarios. The largest worldwide crop model ensemble study proves that uncertainties in simulated impacts increase with carbon dioxide concentrations and associated warming. It was found that an ensemble model approach currently has advantages over individual crop models when it comes to projections of multiple agroecosystem variables under climate change.

Decision making and planning in agriculture increasingly makes use of various model-based tools, particularly in relation to changing climate issues. Scientist use crop models to explore which parts of the world may face the greatest food shortages under climate change, so that efforts to improve food production can be directed to those places. Wheat, which accounts for 20 percent of calories consumed globally, is one of the world’s three most important crops, along with rice and maize.

A large crop model ensemble study was conducted to analyse the effectiveness of 27 wheat models created by top scientists from around the world under both normal and climate change conditions. The researchers found that, if provided with enough information, there are a lot of models that can reproduce experimental data very well under current conditions. But when starting to manipulate the climate data and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations similarly to how climate change will play out in the next 50 to 100 years, the models started to disagree more and more.

The results are reported in a study published this month by the journal Nature Climate Change. Crop model ensemble of the study revealed the significant uncertainties related to climate impact simulations on crop production as anticipated by MTT scientists Rötter, Palosuo and co-authors already two years ago (Rötter et al. 2011 Nature Climate Change 1: 175-177 and Palosuo et al. 2011. European Journal of Agronomy 35: 103-114).

– The new wheat model intercomparison study is a milestone as it demonstrates the importance of model improvements and adequate reporting of uncertainties related to climate change impact models. Both is essential to be able to provide policy makers with reliable information on adaptation options and food security under climate change, says Reimund Rötter, a research professor of MTT Agrifood Research Finland and one of the key authors of the study.

Simulation models gaining importance as tools for the future

Crop or agro-ecosystem modelling has been pursued also in Finland for decades. Taru Palosuo, a principal research scientist of MTT tells that researchers are now actively working together to improve their models using new data from different areas of the world.

– Changes in climate have boosted the global interest on developing and testing the crop models as models are efficient means to synthesize information. Challenges and opportunities in this field of science are large. We also need to educate new scientists and experts that understand potential and limitations of models and modelling, as well as integration of biophysical and socio-economic models.

The wheat modelling study is part of AgMIP, or the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project, an international effort to assess crop models and understand climate change’s impact on food production. MTT has been actively participating the activities in AGMIP as well as co-ordinating the crop modelling part of Modelling European Agriculture with Climate Change for Food Security (MACSUR) knowledge hub under FACCE JPI (www.macsur.eu).

Reimund Rötter is a research professor and Taru Palosuo is a principal research scientiest of MTT Plant Production. They are members of the AgMIP project that is co-ordinated by NASA/Goddard Institute of Space Studies (crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov). AgMIP is aiming for building an interdisciplinary modelling framework that provides more robust assessments of climate change impacts on the agricultural sector.

Original article " Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change". Senthold Asseng, Frank Ewert, Cynthia Rozenzweig et al. Nature Climate Change, 3, June 2013 doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916. Published online 9th June 2013.

Website: http://www.mtt.fi

Published: June 28, 2013